SARS-CoV-2 Igg seroprevalence in IBD patients treated with biologics: first vs. second pandemic wave in a prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: In a prospective study, SARS-CoV-2 IgG seroprevalence was assessed during the second pandemic wave (W2) in a cohort of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) patients using biologics. The secondary aim was to compare, in the same cohort, the frequency of seropositivity and of COVID-19 during the second vs. the first (W1) wave. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From November 2020 to March 2021, SARS-CoV-2 IgG seropositivity and the prevalence of COVID-19 were assessed in a cohort of IBD patients using biologics already studied at W1. INCLUSION CRITERIA: age ≥ 18 years; diagnosis of IBD; follow-up; written consent. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Risk factors for infection, compatible symptoms, history of infection or COVID-19, nasopharyngeal swab test were recorded. Data were expressed as median [range]. The χ2 test, Student's t-test, logistic regression analysis was used. RESULTS: IBD cohort at W1 and W2 included 85 patients: 45 CD (52.9%), 40 UC (47.1%). When comparing the same 85 patients at W2 vs. W1, a higher SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence at W2 was at the limit of the statistical significance (9.4% vs. 2.3%; p=0.05). The prevalence of COVID-19 at W2 vs. W1 was 3.5% (3/85) vs. 0% (0/85) (p=0.08). Contacts with COVID-19 patients and symptoms compatible with COVID-19 were more frequent at W2 vs. W1 (18.8 % vs. 0%; p=0.0001; 34.1% vs. 15.3%; p=0.004). At W2, history of contacts and new onset diarrhea were more frequent in seropositive patients [4/8 (50%) vs. 12/77 (15.6%); p=0.01 and 4/8 (50%) vs. 2/77 (2.6%); p=0.0001]. At W2, the risk factors for seropositivity included cough, fever, new onset diarrhea, rhinitis, arthromyalgia, dysgeusia/anosmia at univariate (p<0.05), but not at multivariate analysis. History of contacts was the only risk factor for seropositivity at univariate (p=0.03), but not at multivariate analysis (p=0.1). CONCLUSIONS: During W2, characterized by a high viral spread, IBD and biologics appeared not to increase the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19 disease. New onset diarrhea mimicking IBD relapse may be observed in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Low prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in inflammatory bowel disease.

OBJECTIVE: Treatments used in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) have been associated with enhanced risk of viral infections and viral reactivation, however, it remains unclear whether IBD patients have increased risk of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. The aim of the study was to examine the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG positivity in IBD patients followed at our referral center. The role of treatments for IBD and risk factors for infection were also evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective study, all IBD patients followed at our referral centre between May 27th and July 21st, 2020 and fulfilling the inclusion criteria were tested for SARS-CoV-2 IgG. Specific IgG antibodies were evaluated by a commercial ELISA kit and SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal swab was performed in seropositive patients. RESULTS: Two-hundred and eighteen patients, 128 Crohn's disease (CD) and 90 Ulcerative colitis (UC) [age 44, (19-77) years; ongoing biologics in 115 (52.7%)] were enrolled. No patient had major SARS-CoV-2-related symptoms. SARS-CoV-2 IgG were detected in 3 out of 218 (1.37%) patients with IBD (2 CD and 1 UC), all on biologics (2.6%). In all of the 3 seropositive patients, the nasopharyngeal swab was negative. There was no relationship between SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and the demographic/clinical characteristics of IBD patients. In contrast, history of recent travel was more frequent in the SARS-CoV-2 seropositive patients (2/3; 66.6%) than in SARS-CoV-2 seronegative patients [7/215 (3.25%); p<0.0001]. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG seropositivity in IBD patients appears to be comparable to the non-IBD population and not influenced by ongoing treatments. Risk factors for infection common to the general non-IBD population should be considered when managing patients with IBD.